Workflow
Trivial work
State the correction and proof inline:
example.txt
fileFix: expired refresh tokens must redirect to /login, not 500.
Verify with: pnpm test:run auth-refresh-expired-token
Implement, run the command, and preserve the output. A non-implementer reviews the final diff and output in the project's native PR, CI, or conversation surface. Do not manufacture a file to prove a process happened.
Structured work
example.txt
fileintent -> spec -> implement -> review -> check -> findings
- Spec:
sus-specwrites intent and requirements with stable IDs andVerify with:lines. Setstatus: readybefore dispatch or review. - Implement: a native worker or human follows the spec by absolute path, runs every verification,
and records real output under
## Execution. - Review: a non-implementer judges the result. Use
sus-reviewwhen risk or later reconstruction earns a formal packet. - Check: use
suspec checkwhen deterministic coverage, command-binding, evidence, or reference reconciliation pays for itself. - Findings: discard transient observations; route verified durable lessons through memory or project records.
Every step has a by-hand path. A fresh human or agent may review without sus-review; the
implementer may not call self-review independent. Work that earns independent review stays blocked
until a non-implementer can judge it. The CLI backs the method; it never gets custody of it.
Escalation
Escalate only when the signal earns the rigor.
A task narrows a source spec; it never adds requirements. A change plan adds transformation order and preservation context; it never replaces the spec.
Proof, not claims
- Preserve fresh output for every verification claim.
- Treat empty evidence as
Unverified, neverSupported. - Expose blocked and unverified work.
- Keep acceptance human-owned.
Next: artifact location and close. Previous: what Suspec is.
Need a starting point? Install the skills